Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 18650

AbstractMaterial and MethodsResultsDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Original article / research
Year : 2024 | Month : February | Volume : 18 | Issue : 2 | Page : EC38 - EC42 Full Version

Unravelling the Enigma of Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumours: A Cross-sectional Study from a Regional Cancer Centre, Karnataka, India


Published: February 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/65439.19106
Usha Amirtham, Rakshitha Hosur Mohan

1. Professor, Department of Oncopathology, Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bangalore, Karnataka, India. 2. Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences, Shimoga, Karnataka, India.

Correspondence Address :
Dr. Rakshitha Hosur Mohan,
Assistant Professor, Department of Pathology, Subbaiah Institute of Medical Sciences, Shimoga-577222, Karnataka, India.
E-mail: rakshita.201@gmail.com

Abstract

Introduction: Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumour (IMT) is an unusual neoplasm with intermediate malignant potential, which rarely metastasises. IMT occurs in various anatomical sites, and the initial descriptions were primarily centered on its manifestation in the lungs. Although the age range is broad, IMT is most common in the first three decades of life, with a slight female predominance. Recent data and Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase (ALK) gene aberrations confirm a neoplastic process for these lesions.

Aim: To study the clinicopathological features of IMTs in a regional cancer centre in South India.

Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study included 17 cases of IMT over six years, from May 2014 to May 2020, at Memorial Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology (KMIO), Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. The clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic features were analysed on needle biopsies and resected specimens. Correlation between the expression of ALK-1 and histological patterns, mimickers, metastasis, and prognosis were described. Results were analysed using Microsoft Excel 2019 and Medcalc calculator.

Results: Seventeen cases of IMTs were included in this study, out of which two were in the lung, and the rest were extrapulmonary. Sixteen cases were unifocal on presentation; however, one IMT of extremity showed evidence of secondaries on bone scan. The mean age at presentation was 33.47 years, and the male-to-female ratio was 1:1.12. Among the seventeen cases, sites are as follows: one each in the retroperitoneum, liver, soft-tissue (extremity), two each in the breast, lung, female genital tract, urinary bladder, and three each in the head and neck region (maxilla, trachea, and alveolus) and mesentery. Microscopically, IMTs showed various histological patterns. Immunostaining for ALK-1 was positive in seven out of seventeen cases, and the rest were diagnosed by excluding closer mimickers.

Conclusion: The present study provides crucial insights into the clinicopathological features of IMTs. Immunohistochemistry (IHC) is an essential diagnostic tool that helps accurately differentiate IMT from its mimickers by identifying ALK protein expression. This distinction is essential for guiding targeted therapy in recurrent or metastatic cases.

Keywords

Diagnosis immunohistochemistry, Metastatic, Neoplasms

WHO defines IMT as a distinct neoplasm composed of myofibroblastic, fibroblastic spindle cells, and inflammatory cell infiltrates (1). This is more commonly seen in the first three decades, with a slight female predominance. Original descriptions of IMT were focused on lungs (2),(3). According to the WHO, the most commonly reported sites include mesentery, omentum, retroperitoneum, lung, mediastinum, and head and neck (1). Unusual locations include somatic soft-tissue, gastrointestinal tract, uterus, bladder, pancreas, and CNS (1).

Microscopically, they comprise of spindled to plump myofibroblasts in an oedematous myxoid background with lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate. There are three basic histological patterns: myxoid, hypercellular, hypocellular, and a rare subtype with epithelioid morphology (1),(4),(5).

IHC for ALK shows variable expression, which also depends on its fusion partner (6),(7). ALK positivity is seen in 40-60% of the IMT cases (1). Because of its ambiguous clinical presentation, it must be differentiated from other closer mimickers like infectious, granulomatous, autoimmune, and malignant lesions based on histopathologic findings and immunohistochemical analysis (8). A rare variant of IMT with epitheloid morphology has a poor prognosis with rapid development of local recurrence. It has been recognised as a variant of IMT with RANBP2-ALK gene rearrangement (1),(4). ALK-1 expression is also prognostically important.

IMT is a diagnosis of exclusion and must be distinguished from other closer mimics. ALK protein expression by IHC and/or gene rearrangement favour the diagnosis of IMT over another differential diagnosis in challenging cases, although ALK expression can be variable. It also aids in selecting targeted therapy in recurrent or metastatic disease. ALK expression is also correlated with recurrence and metastasis. In the present study, the authors aimed to analyse the clinicopathological and immunophenotypical features of IMT.

Material and Methods

A six-year cross-sectional study was conducted from May 2014 to May 2020 in the Department of Pathology at Kidwai Memorial Institute of Oncology, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India. Since the study was retrospective and did not involve any intervention, an exemption from the ethical committee was obtained. All newly clinically and radiologically investigated cases of IMT were included in the study, and recurrent disease at presentation was excluded.

The study comprised 17 cases of IMT, including 13 institutional and four review cases from elsewhere. Clinical details were obtained from hospital records. The clinicopathologic and immunophenotypic features were analysed on needle biopsies (n=7) and resected specimens (n=10). The study evaluated the age and gender of patients, the affected sites, and the gross findings. Various histological patterns were observed, and ALK-1 expression was correlated with histological patterns, metastasis, and recurrence.

Haematoxylin and Eosin (H&E) stained sections were examined and classified into three main histological patterns and a rare epithelioid subtype based on morphological criteria described in the WHO classification of tumours of soft tissue and bone. The patterns observed were myxoid, hypercellular, hypocellular, and the rare epithelioid subtype, which is considered aggressive.

IHC was performed to rule out other closer mimickers, such as granulation tissue, nodular fasciitis, dermatofibroma, inflammatory fibroid polyp, fibromatosis, leiomyoma, gastrointestinal stromal tumour, leiomyosarcoma, Ewing’s sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, and melanoma. Several markers were used, including Pancytokeratin (PanCK), Epithelial Membrane Antigen (EMA), CD34, CD68, Smooth Muscle Actin (SMA), S-100, Vimentin, Desmin, ALK-1, Myogenin, Myo D1, CD117, beta-catenin, H Caldesmon, MIC 2/CD99, melan A, and Ki67. The clone used for ALK IHC was SP144 (Rabbit monoclonal). The stain was considered positive when the tumour cells expressed specific cytoplasmic and/or nuclear membrane staining for the antibody used. Slides observed were assigned a score of 0 (no staining - negative), 1 (<10% of neoplastic cells staining - weak positive), 2 (10%-50% of neoplastic cells staining - moderate positive), or 3 (>50% of neoplastic cells staining - strong positive).

The study results were analysed using Microsoft Excel 2019.

Results

Clinical Characteristics

Out of the 17 cases of IMTs identified in the present study, two were in the lung, while the rest were extrapulmonary, and the cases were reviewed. The mean age at presentation was 33.47 years. The study included eight male (n=8) and nine female patients (n=9), resulting in a male-to-female ratio of 1:1.12. Among the seventeen cases, the sites were as follows: one each in the retroperitoneum (n=1), liver (n=1), and soft tissue (extremity) (n=1); two each in the breast (n=2), lung (n=2), female genital tract (n=2), and urinary bladder (n=2); and three each in the head and neck region (maxilla, trachea, and alveolus) (n=3) and mesentery (n=3) (Table/Fig 1). Sixteen cases were unifocal on presentation; however, one IMT of the extremity showed evidence of secondary involvement on a bone scan during follow-up.

Uncommon Findings

Case number 13 involved a 65-year-old male patient with left ankle swelling. An X-ray revealed an ill-defined soft-tissue density lesion around the ankle joint, extending into the plantar and dorsal aspects of the foot with erosion of the tarsal bones (Table/Fig 2)a.

A follow-up Computed Tomography (CT) scan of the abdomen showed hepatic metastasis, and a bone scan revealed abnormally increased radiotracer concentration at multiple sites (left parietal bone, right temporal bone, and in the left iliac bone close to the sacroiliac joint), suggestive of numerous skeletal secondaries (Table/Fig 2)b. The patient underwent left below-knee amputation, which was followed by a histological examination suggesting epithelioid IMT.

In case number 11, a 50-year-old female patient had an IMT in the trachea. She presented with slightly higher Ig M levels, i.e., 262.2 mg/dL (Normal range for adults: 40-230 mg/dL), and a possible M spike in the beta region; however, her bone marrow examination ruled out plasma cell neoplasm.

Gross findings: Most tumours were nodular/multinodular masses with a tan, fleshy, or myxoid appearance. The resected specimens ranged in size from 2 to 15 cm and exhibited nodular, well-circumscribed to polypoidal appearances. The cut surface showed grey-white to grey-brown areas, which were firm in consistency. Variable areas of haemorrhage, necrosis, and calcification were observed. (Table/Fig 2)c shows a gross picture of a case of bladder IMT (case number 3 in a 10-year-old male child), having a mucoid and glistening appearance.

Treatment and follow-up data: The primary treatment modality was surgical excision with negative margins. All cases, except two, underwent surgical excision. In cases where the location was inoperable, or when only a biopsy was done, or in localised lesions with R1 resection (microscopic positive resection margin), vinblastine and methotrexate were administered along with other chemotherapy regimens. If the patient presented with a positive ALK status in recurrent or metastatic disease, crizotinib was administered.

Out of 17 cases, 13 were followed-up, of which five patients showed disease-free survival, two were alive with evidence of local recurrence on follow-up, and four were alive with no evidence of disease on the last follow-up. One patient remained symptomatic, and another died of the disease. One of the recurrent cases showed metastasis and succumbed to the disease.

Histological characteristics and immunohistochemical staining: Microscopically, all tumours were composed of fascicles of spindled myofibroblasts intermingled with lymphoplasmacytic infiltrate and were categorised as follows according to the WHO. (Table/Fig 3)a-e shows the various histological patterns observed in the current study: spindled/plump myofibroblasts in a myxoid background (n=4), hypercellular pattern with fascicles of spindle cells with distinct inflammatory cell infiltrate (n=8), hypocellular fibrous pattern (n=3), and epithelioid morphology (Epithelioid Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Sarcoma (EIMS)) (n=2). Fifteen cases showed classical morphology, whereas two had EIMS (Table/Fig 3)a-e.

Immunohistochemistry (IHC): Immunostaining for ALK-1 was positive in 7 out of 17 cases (Table/Fig 4)a,b. There was variable expression for SMA (n=14, 82.35%), vimentin (n=6, 35.29%), desmin (n=5, 29.41%), EMA (n=1, 5.88%), and weak focal CD 68 immunoreactivity (n=4, 23.52%) (Table/Fig 4)a-e. Cells were negative for Myo D 1, myogenin, CD117, CD34, beta-catenin, H caldesmon, MIC 2, and melan A, which helped rule out other benign and malignant spindle cell neoplasms that mimic IMT.

Discussion

According to the WHO, IMT is a heterogeneous neoplasm classified under the intermediate and rarely metastasising group. Brunn first described IMT in 1939 (5), and it was named by Umiker WO and Iverson L in 1954 (3). According to KMIO statistics, IMT constituted 10% of fibroblastic/myofibroblastic tumours and 2.5% of soft-tissue tumours during the study period (departmental statistics).

IMT primarily affects children and young adults, although the age range extends throughout adulthood, and in our present study, 35.29% of children and young adults were involved. According to the literature, IMT mainly affects the lung (3); however, in the present study, pulmonary IMT constituted only about 11.76%, and we had a higher number (88.24%) of extrapulmonary cases. According to Wang Z et al., the most common site was the abdominopelvic region (73.9%), followed by other locations; their observations were similar to the present study, wherein IMTs in the abdominopelvic region constituted about 52.9% (6). Extrapulmonary sites are rarely reported in the literature (9), and even rarer are sites like soft tissues of the extremities, bones, and joints (10),(11),(12),(13),(14),(15),(16),(17),(18),(19). Only a few case reports on soft-tissue IMT (16),(17) exist. The present study included a rare case of soft-tissue IMT (ankle) with recurrences and metastasis, which had EIMS.

The WHO classification of soft-tissue and bone tumours categorises IMT into three basic histologic patterns and a rare subtype with epithelioid morphology (1). The patterns are as follows: myxoid, hypercellular, and hypocellular. Essential criteria include spindled to plump myofibroblasts, mixed inflammatory cell infiltrate, and variable fibrous-myxoid stroma. It is important to differentiate them from other similar conditions such as Nodular fasciitis, fibromatosis, inflammatory fibroid polyps, and granulation tissue, with the help of IHC.

In the present study, extrapulmonary cases outnumbered pulmonary cases, and ALK-1 expression was noted in 41.2% (n=7) of cases. Recurrence was noted in two cases (11.7%) and metastasis in one case (5.9%), both of which showed ALK-1 negativity. In a similar study of 18 cases by Telugu RB et al., pulmonary IMTs outnumbered other sites, ALK-1 expression was noted in 55.6% of cases, and recurrence was noted in 30% of ALK-1 positive cases and 37.5% of ALK-1 negative cases. Metastasis was noted only in the ALK-1 positive group (7). There was no statistically significant correlation between ALK-1 expression and tumour recurrence or metastasis.

Jiang YH et al., in their retrospective study of 15 cases, found a significant correlation between ALK-1 positivity and lower rates of recurrence and metastasis in IMTs (20). Recurrence was noted in 25% and 63.6% of ALK-1 positive and negative IMTs, respectively. Metastasis was noted only in the ALK-1 negative group (Table/Fig 5). This explains the variability in the site of occurrence and clinical behaviour of IMT in association with ALK.

IMTs show variable staining for SMA, Muscle-Specific Actin (MSA), and Desmin. These tumours were considered a neoplasm after the discovery of clonal rearrangement of the ALK gene. Approximately 50-60% harbor clonal rearrangements at 2p23, and this gene has a variety of fusion partners, including TPM3, TPM4, CLTC, CARS, ATIC, SEC31L1, AND RANBP2 (1). A previous study by Chaudhary P showed that ALK gene rearrangement was higher in younger individuals compared to adults, similar to the present study where ALK positivity was observed in young male individuals aged 9-11 years (Case-1-4,15) (21). However, we observed that ALK expression was predominantly seen in males. An 11-year retrospective study by Wang Z et al., on 23 cases of IMT revealed that ALK-1 was negative in 11 out of 13 cases, reflecting the variable expression of ALK-1 (6). According to Mariño-Enríquez A et al., ALK-1 positivity was demonstrated in IMT with epithelioid morphology, but in the present study, ALK-1 was negative in cases with epithelioid morphology (22). However, FISH could not be done due to financial constraints. While recent literature lacks studies directly comparing ALK expression and recurrence risk, a study of seven cases comparing morphological aspects of IMT and IgG4-related disease included four ALK-positive cases. Interestingly, among the remaining three ALK-negative cases, two experienced recurrence, and none had metastasis. This study indirectly suggests that there may not be a significant association between ALK positivity and recurrence, which is in line with other similar studies and our own findings (23).

The localisation of ALK-1 within the cell is determined by its fusion partner (1). Diffuse cytoplasmic staining is observed with TPM3, TPM4, CARS, ATIC, and SEC31L1, and nuclear staining with RANBP2. Granular cytoplasmic staining is observed with the fusion partner CLTC (1),(2). RANBP2-ALK fusion, which shows a distinctive ALK nuclear membrane immunoreactivity pattern, behaves aggressively (24). Evidence of kinase fusion supports targeted therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, including crizotinib (25),(26).

Interestingly, ETV6-NTRK3 fusion is reported in ALK-negative IMTs (2). Intra-abdominal IMTs are associated with recurrence (6). According to the literature, 25% of extrapulmonary IMTs recur, and metastasis is rare, at 2% (1). In the present study, recurrence and metastasis were observed in a case of soft-tissue IMT of the extremity. IMTs with epithelioid morphology behave aggressively (1),(26). According to the WHO, ALK-negative IMTs have a higher likelihood of metastasis, similar to the findings in the present study. These ambiguous tumours of unknown etiology can occur anywhere in the body, including rare locations such as intracranial, orbital, and spinal regions, and hence extensive work-up and IHC support making the final diagnosis (26). ALK expression helps confirm a case of IMT and has a role in prognosis and survival. IMTs exhibit heterogeneous clinical presentations, varied molecular expressions, and diverse outcomes, underscoring the enigmatic nature of these tumours. By unraveling the molecular mechanisms that drive these tumours, more effective treatment can be provided, which further improves diagnostic accuracy.

Limitation(s)

The present study was limited by the smaller number of cases, and FISH for ALK gene rearrangement was not performed due to financial constraints.

Conclusion

IMT is a diagnosis of exclusion and must be distinguished from other closer mimics. ALK protein expression by IHC and/or gene rearrangement by FISH favours the diagnosis of IMT over other mimickers in challenging cases. While the study sheds light on the diagnostic utility of ALK protein expression in distinguishing IMTs, further investigations are warranted to explore the underlying molecular mechanisms driving the neoplastic process. Additionally, prospective studies could assess the efficacy of targeted therapies based on ALK status, paving the way for personalised treatment strategies in the management of IMTs. Collaborative efforts and larger cohorts may provide deeper insights into the prognostic significance of specific histological patterns and guide clinical decision-making.

References

1.
The WHO Classification of Tumours Editorial Board. WHO Classification of Tumours Soft-tissue and Bone Tumours, 5th ed. Lyon: IARC Press; 2020.
2.
Enzinger and Weiss’s Soft-tissue Tumours. 7th ed. Goldblum JR, Folpe AL, and Weiss SW, .7th ed. Philadelphia, PA: Elsevier, 2020.
3.
Umiker WO, Iverson L. Post inflammatory tumours of the lung: Report of four cases simulating xanthoma, fibroma or plasma cell tumour. J Thorac Surg. 1954;28(1):55-63. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
Du X, Gao Y, Zhao H, Li B, Xue W, Wang D. Clinicopathological analysis of epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma. Oncology Letters. 2018;15(6):9317-26. [crossref][PubMed]
5.
Brunn H. Two interesting benign lung tumours of contradictory histopathology: Remarks on the necessity for maintaining the chest tumour registry. Journal of Thoracic Cardiovascular. 1939;9(2):119-31. [crossref]
6.
Wang Z, Zhao X, Li K, Yao W, Dong K, Xiao X, et al. Analysis of clinical features and outcomes for inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours in China: 11 years of experience at a single center. Pediatr Surg Int. 2016;32(3):239-43. [crossref][PubMed]
7.
Telugu RB, Prabhu AJ, Kalappurayil NB, Mathai J, Gnanamuthu BR, Manipadam MT. Clinicopathological study of 18 cases of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours with reference to ALK-1 expression: 5-year experience in a tertiary care center. J Pathol Transl Med. 2017;51(3):255-63. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Cantera JE, Alfaro MP, Rafart DC, Zalazar R, Muruzabal MM, Barquín PG, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours: A pictorial review. Insights Imaging. 2015;6(1):85-96. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Saxena S, Dhal I, Mohanpuria A, Garg J, Karnik S, Khedkar B. Extrapulmonary inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour at different sites with histopathology and immunohistochemical analysis: A case series. Oncol J India. 2018;2(4):80-85.[crossref]
10.
Montoya F, Ereño C, Zabala A, Carrasco A, Martínez-Ibargüen A, Sánchez-Fernández JM. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of the temporal bone: A histologically nonmalignant lesion with fatal outcome. Skull Base. 2008;18(5):339-43. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Oh JH, Yim JH, Yoon BW, Choi BJ, Lee DW, Kwon YD. Inflammatory pseudotumour in the mandible. J Craniofac Surg. 2008;19(6):1552-53. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Williamson RA, Paueksakon P, Coker NJ. Inflammatory pseudotumour of the temporal bone. Otology and Neurotology. 2003;24(5):818-22. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Rautava J, Soukka T, Peltonen E, Nurmenniemi P, Kallajoki M, Syrjänen S. Unusual case of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour in the maxilla. Case Reports in Dentistry. 2013;2013:876503. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Yuan XP, Li CX, Cao Y, Singh S, Zhong R. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of the maxillary sinus: CT and MRI findings. Clinical Radiology. 2012;67(12):53-57. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Wang K, Guo R, Siegal GP, Wei S. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of bone harboring an ALK gene amplification. Pathol Res Pract. 2019;215(9):152535. [crossref][PubMed]
16.
Masciocchi C, Lanni G, Conti L, Conchiglia A, Fascetti E, Flamini S, et al. Soft-tissue inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours (IMTs) of the limbs: Potential and limits of diagnostic imaging. Skeletal Radiol. 2012;41(6):643-49. [crossref][PubMed]
17.
Savvidou OD, Sakellariou VI, Papakonstantinou O, Skarpidi E, Papagelopoulos PJ. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of the thigh: Presentation of a rare case and review of the literature. Case Rep Orthop. 2015;2015:814241. [crossref][PubMed]
18.
Chen J, Li H, Yang Z, Liu Q, Gao M, Jiang X, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of bone: Two cases occurring in long bone. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40(1):117-22. [crossref][PubMed]
19.
Sciot R, Dal Cin P, Fletcher CD, Hernandez JM, Garcia JL, Samson I, et al. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of bone: Report of two cases with evidence of clonal chromosomal changes. Am J Surg Pathol. 1997;21(10):1166-72. [crossref][PubMed]
20.
Jiang YH, Cheng B, Ge MH, Cheng Y, Zhang G. Comparison of the clinical and immunohistochemical features, including anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and p53, in inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours. J Int Med Res. 2009;37(3):867-77. [crossref][PubMed]
21.
Chaudhary P. Mesenteric inflammatory myofibroblastic tumours. Ann Gastroenterol. 2015;28(1):49-54.
22.
Mariño-Enríquez A, Wang WL, Roy A, Lopez-Terrada D, Lazar AJ, Fletcher CD, et al. Epithelioid inflammatory myofibroblastic sarcoma: An aggressive intra-abdominal variant of inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour with nuclear membrane or perinuclear ALK. Am J Surg Pathol. 2011;35(1):135-44. [crossref][PubMed]
23.
Chougule A, Taylor M, Kurzawa P, Chebib I, Le L, Deshpande, V. Morphologic overlap between inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour and IgG4-related disease: Lessons from next-generation sequencing. Am J Surg Pathol. 2019;43(3):314-24. [crossref][PubMed]
24.
Alderman M, Kunju LP. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour of the bladder. Archives of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine. 2014;138(10):1272-77. [crossref][PubMed]
25.
Mahajan P, Casanova M, Ferrari A, Fordham A, Trahair T, Venkatramani R. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour: Molecular landscape, targeted therapeutics, and remaining challenges. Curr Probl Cancer. 2021;45(4):100768. [crossref][PubMed]
26.
Gros L, Dei Tos AP, Jones RL, Digklia A. Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumour: State of the art. Cancers (Basel). 2022;14(15):3662.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/65439.19106

Date of Submission: Oct 08, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Oct 28, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Jan 19, 2024
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was Ethics Committee Approval obtained for this study? No
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? Yes
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: Oct 08, 2023
• Manual Googling: Dec 02, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Jan 16, 2024 (8%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com